edjog Photo
Smack X Photo
H5N1 Photo
Hosted by Putfile.com

 Search: 
 
For words, meanings or references.
Hosted by Putfile.com
fuckin tunes on then...

Hosted by Putfile.com

Tuesday, January 24, 2006

Guido Fawkes is a spineless shitbag

So, i wasn't going to link to this post, because i made something of a dick of myself in the comments, but the story goes on.

BACKGROUND:
Guido Fawkes is a blogger who has claimed to have been instrumental in the "outing" of Mark Oaten, the Liberal Democrat MP who has been rumbled in a scandal involving male prostitution. Whatever, i say: it's none of our business who he fucks or how much he pays for the service. I'll add though that considering the shameful prejudice in action against Charles Kennedy (the Lib Dem ex-leader) and his drinking, i have little sympathy for Oaten's being forced out of the race to succeed him. Attempting to avoid the issue of whipping up prejudice for which he was being taken to task, Fawkes scorned those who were not "in the gutter", claiming a spurious superiority to those perceived as 'intellectual'.

So, i had mistakenly castigated Justin @ ChickenYoghurt [title link] for this comment:
"Ah Guido, we are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at Mark Oaten's arse."
I'll confess to having gotten bored and skim read the comments, so not realised it had been made by Justin, who was certainly implying that Fawkes was the one fixated upon Oaten's arse. He was understandibly irritated and held me to account, adding that i should take anything i had to say further to it's source; for which dick-headedness i apologised and took his suggestion as the proper thing to do. At Guido Fawkes' blog, i opined thus:
At 7:35 AM, edjog said...

Guido Fawkes, you're a nasty little proselytiser of prejudice and your wit is substandard to boot (oh how i wish i could be bothered). Far from "in the gutter" as you claim, you are the gutter's raison d'etre: the small walleted in pursuit of the small minded.

Get to fuck.
To which came the following replies:
At 9:17 AM, Guido Fawkes said...

Edjog,

I see you have more hair than brains. Bothered.

At 12:02 PM, Lagwolf said...

Edjog...wow impressive...did you need help writing out that little paragraph? Is it painful to pick your knuckles off the floor long enough to type?
To which patently absurd denigration of my intellect, i replied thusly:
Booyaka!
It seems the shitbag Fawkes cannot stand to be refuted by evidence of my intelligence combined with wit, or the thought that someone far more acquainted with "the gutter" than he could lead him into such a simple trap, because my last comment has been deleted. What a spineless tosser!

Nod: Chicken Yoghurt: Oaten

UPDATE (02:25 06/01/25 GMT): so Guy Fawkes emailed me to whine!
From: Guy Fawkes
Date: 2006/01/24 Tue PM 09:18:31 GMT
To: edjog
Subject: Re: [Guy Fawkes' blog of parliamentary plots, rumours and conspiracy] 1/24/2006 09:13:52 PM

You seem to be under some delusion that this is not my private property, from which I will exclude and delete you. It is not a commons.

Goodnight.

On 1/24/06, edjog wrote:
Deleted twice? A comprehensive and witty, but non-vulger, one word rebuttal and my previous gloating over it's deletion both gone? Wow! Your humiliation must be intense. Good. Delete away... the truth is out there, as you well know!

--
Posted by edjog to Guy Fawkes' blog of parliamentary plots, rumours and conspiracy at 1/24/2006 09:13:52 PM
--
Guido Fawkes Esq.
So not only spineless and lacking wit, but a pompous prick to boot (needing the latter applied to the anus, sharpish). A fact i was sure to point out to him in my reply, as i'm certain you can all imagine.

Technorati Tags:

Links to this post:

Create a Link

BlogRankers.com ~ Vote or Comment on this Blog @BlogRankers.com.

2 Comments:

Blogger pocketpunk said...

ahhh a battle of the wits .....gets the blood surging

25/1/06 11:50  
Blogger edjog said...

Actually, he was a bit too easy and gave up before we got going. Shame. I've had some info that he's quite a sinister man, not confirmed yet so i'll not repeat, but it would have been good fun to cross swords with someone who has pretensions to be a 'mover & shaker'. And on a more serious note, tear his arguments a new hole. But like many of that ilk, he can dish it but can't take it.

25/1/06 12:12  

Post a Comment

<< Home